Policy Budget Review
Evaluate UN budgets and programmes as an AI Secretary-General
An adviser to your AI Secretary-General briefs you on each programme's purpose, beneficiaries, performance indicators and issues, based solely on the original IATI text.
Based on that, you can judge for yourself, as a world citizen, whether the budget is appropriate, should be kept, or should be rebuilt.
Explore UN programmes
Browse by entity or filter by region and country. Click a programme to open the AI adviser briefing and citizen evaluation. Inter-agency transfers and headquarters overhead are excluded.
United Nations Office for the Coordination of Humanitarian Affairs · Africa · 14 programmes
Top 80 direct programmes matching this selection, by budget. Inter-agency transfers and headquarters overhead are excluded.
- OCHA Field activities, Democratic Republic of Congo$43.1MUnited Nations Office for the Coordination of Humanitarian Affairs · Emergency Response · DR Congo
- OCHA Field activities, Sudan$39.7MUnited Nations Office for the Coordination of Humanitarian Affairs · Emergency Response · Sudan
- OCHA Field activities, South Sudan$29.8MUnited Nations Office for the Coordination of Humanitarian Affairs · Emergency Response · South Sudan
- OCHA Field activities, Somalia$29.4MUnited Nations Office for the Coordination of Humanitarian Affairs · Emergency Response · Somalia
- OCHA Field activities, Central African Republic$28.5MUnited Nations Office for the Coordination of Humanitarian Affairs · Emergency Response · Central African Republic
- OCHA Field activities, Ethiopia$27.4MUnited Nations Office for the Coordination of Humanitarian Affairs · Emergency Response · Ethiopia
- OCHA Field activities, Mali$19.2MUnited Nations Office for the Coordination of Humanitarian Affairs · Emergency Response · Mali
- OCHA Field activities, Nigeria$18.3MUnited Nations Office for the Coordination of Humanitarian Affairs · Emergency Response · Nigeria
- OCHA Field activities, Chad$17.2MUnited Nations Office for the Coordination of Humanitarian Affairs · Emergency Response · Chad
- OCHA Field activities, Niger$16.9MUnited Nations Office for the Coordination of Humanitarian Affairs · Emergency Response · Niger
- OCHA Field activities, Burkina Faso$16.0MUnited Nations Office for the Coordination of Humanitarian Affairs · Emergency Response · Burkina Faso
- OCHA Field activities, Cameroon$13.9MUnited Nations Office for the Coordination of Humanitarian Affairs · Emergency Response · Cameroon
- OCHA Field activities, Eritrea$2.1MUnited Nations Office for the Coordination of Humanitarian Affairs · Emergency Response · Eritrea
- OCHA Field activities, Libya$2.1MUnited Nations Office for the Coordination of Humanitarian Affairs · Emergency Response · Libya
OCHA Field activities, Sudan
In Sudan, the Office for the Coordination of Humanitarian Affairs (OCHA) delivers its mandate through its core functions of coordination, advocacy, humanitarian financing, policy and information management providing local coordination support to humanitarian organisations, liaising with the local government and, where applicable, with the integrated UN Mission and other entities. In 2021 humanitarians were able to reach more than 8.1 million people in need in Sudan. With growing needs, humanitarian organisations have continued assistance despite operational challenges posed by conflict, the economic crisis and Covid-19. However, more funding is still required, the 2021 Humanitarian Response Plan was only 37% funded. It is against this backdrop that the 2022 Humanitarian Response Plan has been developed.
View original IATI recordLive briefing from your AI Secretary-General's adviser
It's hard to tell at a glance what this programme actually does. The AI adviser summarizes it using only the original IATI text.
The adviser is reading the source text…
Citizen evaluation
Judge for yourself, as a world citizen, whether this programme's budget is appropriate. No login needed — one vote per programme, changeable any time.
- Increase0/0 · 0%
- Keep0/0 · 0%
- Reduce0/0 · 0%
A reference record of citizen participation — not a ranking or score.