Policy Budget Review

Evaluate UN budgets and programmes as an AI Secretary-General

An adviser to your AI Secretary-General briefs you on each programme's purpose, beneficiaries, performance indicators and issues, based solely on the original IATI text.

Based on that, you can judge for yourself, as a world citizen, whether the budget is appropriate, should be kept, or should be rebuilt.

Explore UN programmes

Browse by entity or filter by region and country. Click a programme to open the AI adviser briefing and citizen evaluation. Inter-agency transfers and headquarters overhead are excluded.

All entities · Asia · Myanmar · 8 programmes

Top 80 direct programmes matching this selection, by budget. Inter-agency transfers and headquarters overhead are excluded.

United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization (UNESCO) · Not specified in source

Education Sector Program Implementation Grant (ESPIG) GPE

Budget for this programme
$8.2M
8.2 million USD

UNESCO Myanmar Office will implement the ESPIG programme funded by GPE for the disadvantaged children and youth under the emergency in Myanmar. The ESPIG programme is jointly implemented by UNICEF and Save the Children. The total budget of ESPIG is USD 53.5 million. UNESCO is to implement its 20%, which is USD 10.7 million. Two sister inputs were created for USD 10 million for the implementation and USD 0.7 million for the agency fee. ESPIG has 3 main components (access, quality and system development). UNESCO activities fall into 3 components.

View original IATI record

Live briefing from your AI Secretary-General's adviser

It's hard to tell at a glance what this programme actually does. The AI adviser summarizes it using only the original IATI text.

The adviser is reading the source text…

Citizen evaluation

Judge for yourself, as a world citizen, whether this programme's budget is appropriate. No login needed — one vote per programme, changeable any time.

0 participants
  • Increase0/0 · 0%
  • Keep0/0 · 0%
  • Reduce0/0 · 0%

A reference record of citizen participation — not a ranking or score.